<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A LETTER FROM A HILLARY WANNA BE</title>
	<link>http://nixhillary2008.blogsome.com/2006/09/23/a-letter-from-a-hillary-wanna-be/</link>
	<description>We must stop Hillary Clinton in 2008</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: MissouriPA</title>
		<link>http://nixhillary2008.blogsome.com/2006/09/23/a-letter-from-a-hillary-wanna-be/#comment-20</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:03:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nixhillary2008.blogsome.com/2006/09/23/a-letter-from-a-hillary-wanna-be/#comment-20</guid>
					<description>Oh, but you forget! Adult stem cell and cord stem cell research is very productive. 
They have actually produced around 90 cures and/or treatments for a variety of 
diseases, ranging from skin grafts for burn victims to spinal cord injuries, to 
leukemia, etc.. They however, have the unfortunate side-effect of not killing the
unborn. In fact, they can even be retrieved from liposuction. So, you can see why
they lose their charm to liberals. They also don't cause those irritating cancerous
tumors that have prevented even a single human trial study of embryonic stem cells, 
or the immune vs host disease that is also rather a nuisance. But, I'm sure if we 
kill a lot more embryos, spend a lot more taxpayers' dollars, and ignore the research
that works, I'm sure we might have something to show for it in 5-10 years. Although 
adult stem cells have been USED to treat HUMANS for nearly 20 years, if the liberals 
follow Slick Willy's cue, and continue to try to discredit Fox News, and somehow get 
control of such bloggers as us, then they can keep that under wraps. Then, cloning 
will be one of our unalienalbe rights, as long as we don't say &quot;God&quot; within a 50 mile 
radius of any school. Oh, and before some liberal starts telling me I said the 'n-
word' when I was in college (since that seems to be the only answer they have when
faced with facts) I am an Oncologist dedicated to my patients, and their quality of
life, as well as their cures. I have studied this subject extensively. I am strongly
for investing in research that leads to CURES and not death. An embryo is an unborn 
child, period. The only time a non-scientist calls it an embryo is if they are for 
killing it. Somehow, it sounds more pallitable. (Has anyone ever heard of a woman 
who is happy about her pregnancy, refer to her unborn child as a fetus, or embryo,
no matter how far along she is?) If abortion is moral, especially partial-birth which 
requires actual murder on the part of the physican, then where is the line drawn? 
Because I would like to make a case for post-birth abortion, and Michael Moore. I
would be willing to perform the &quot;medical procedure&quot; as pro-abortionists refer to the \
killing of the unborn. See how language changes everything? (Most of us still have 
access to a thesaurus, in case you liberals thought we fell for it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh, but you forget! Adult stem cell and cord stem cell research is very productive.<br />
They have actually produced around 90 cures and/or treatments for a variety of<br />
diseases, ranging from skin grafts for burn victims to spinal cord injuries, to<br />
leukemia, etc.. They however, have the unfortunate side-effect of not killing the<br />
unborn. In fact, they can even be retrieved from liposuction. So, you can see why<br />
they lose their charm to liberals. They also don&#8217;t cause those irritating cancerous<br />
tumors that have prevented even a single human trial study of embryonic stem cells,<br />
or the immune vs host disease that is also rather a nuisance. But, I&#8217;m sure if we<br />
kill a lot more embryos, spend a lot more taxpayers&#8217; dollars, and ignore the research<br />
that works, I&#8217;m sure we might have something to show for it in 5-10 years. Although<br />
adult stem cells have been USED to treat HUMANS for nearly 20 years, if the liberals<br />
follow Slick Willy&#8217;s cue, and continue to try to discredit Fox News, and somehow get<br />
control of such bloggers as us, then they can keep that under wraps. Then, cloning<br />
will be one of our unalienalbe rights, as long as we don&#8217;t say &#8220;God&#8221; within a 50 mile<br />
radius of any school. Oh, and before some liberal starts telling me I said the &#8216;n-<br />
word&#8217; when I was in college (since that seems to be the only answer they have when<br />
faced with facts) I am an Oncologist dedicated to my patients, and their quality of<br />
life, as well as their cures. I have studied this subject extensively. I am strongly<br />
for investing in research that leads to CURES and not death. An embryo is an unborn<br />
child, period. The only time a non-scientist calls it an embryo is if they are for<br />
killing it. Somehow, it sounds more pallitable. (Has anyone ever heard of a woman<br />
who is happy about her pregnancy, refer to her unborn child as a fetus, or embryo,<br />
no matter how far along she is?) If abortion is moral, especially partial-birth which<br />
requires actual murder on the part of the physican, then where is the line drawn?<br />
Because I would like to make a case for post-birth abortion, and Michael Moore. I<br />
would be willing to perform the &#8220;medical procedure&#8221; as pro-abortionists refer to the \<br />
killing of the unborn. See how language changes everything? (Most of us still have<br />
access to a thesaurus, in case you liberals thought we fell for it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
